Gotta blame someone, right? Our “drug induced homicide” law

keatingThe Chicago Tribune is reporting that a Romeoville woman is being charged with “drug induced homicide” in the heroin overdose death of a young man a year and a half ago.  According to the story:

A 22-year-old Romeoville woman serving time in the Illinois Department of Corrections on two Will County drug convictions has been charged with drug-induced homicide in the fatal heroin overdose of a 20-year-old Plainfield-area man in 2011.

Will County Sheriff’s Police spokeswoman Kathy Hoffmeyer said Kristina L. Keating, of the 2000 block of Whitmore Drive, provided Emelio R. Medina with heroin on Oct. 28, 2011, from a source in Chicago. Medina’s mother and sister found him unresponsive in his bedroom around 1 p.m. the next day, Hoffmeyer said.

Keating and two other friends told investigators they had been with Medina the previous night at his home, where he was restricted as the result of a residential burglary conviction, Hoffmeyer said. …

She is the second person this week to be charged with drug-induced homicide, a Class X felony …

The statute states:

(720 ILCS 5/9-3.3) (from Ch. 38, par. 9-3.3)
    Sec. 9-3.3. Drug-induced homicide.
    (a) A person who violates Section 401 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act or Section 55 of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act by unlawfully delivering a controlled substance to another, and any person's death is caused by the injection, inhalation, absorption, or ingestion of any amount of that controlled substance, commits the offense of drug-induced homicide.
    (b) Sentence. Drug-induced homicide is a Class X felony.
    (c) A person who commits drug-induced homicide by violating subsection (a) or subsection (c) of Section 401 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act or Section 55 of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act commits a Class X felony for which the defendant shall in addition to a sentence authorized by law, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 15 years and not more than 30 years or an extended term of not less than 30 years and not more than 60 years.
(Source: P.A. 97-191, eff. 7-22-11.)

While the original idea behind this statute was to punish drug dealers for poisoning our youth, in my experience, the reality of actual “drug induced homicide” cases is that they are about two friends/lovers/co-dependent addicts who are sharing heroin.  One dies, and the other is charged as if he or she is at fault.

All that is required for this charge is a “delivery” of a controlled substance, which causes death.  A “delivery” occurs just by handing someone some drugs.  No sale is required.

I suspect that a lot of these prosecutions are urged on by grieving parents.  No one has to tell me what it is like to have a loved one die because of a heroin addiction.  It has happened in my family.  I have also seen it with clients.  I suppose that it is only natural that the parents of the deceased will seek to blame someone else for the death — and ignore the fact that it was their son or daughter who injected themselves with the drugs.  Instead, their target becomes the boyfriend who got her started on heroin or the girlfriend who kept causing him to relapse.

I don’t deny that often there is some truth to these assertions.  But the fact is that an addict will keep hanging around the people, places and things that are bad for him because he craves that hit and he wants to be around those people that can provide it.

The person who usually gets charged with “drug induced homicide” is not a pusher but a fellow addict, someone who cannot control his or her own cravings, and someone who, but for the grace of god, is lucky to still be alive.

What is gained by prosecuting such a person, assigning blame for a homicide, and locking him up from fifteen to sixty years?  Why not just charge him with possession of narcotics, and send him to treatment and random urine tests? One approach condemns, the other might save.

What do you think?

9 thoughts on “Gotta blame someone, right? Our “drug induced homicide” law

  1. Pingback: The Tribune looks into Illinois’ Drug Induced Homicide law | illinoisduilawyer

  2. My friend Benjamin drove two girls to the city to pick up hetoin, in return for the ride the females paid him in heroin. So he drops the girls off and leaves, having never entering the house. Now, apparently one of the females gave her boyfriend some heroin and he overdoses and dies. Now my friend Benjamin is being charged with drug induced homicide. I just don’t see how they can charge him with that.

  3. i just wanted to thank you. This is my daughter and this is a horible thing!!! i appreciate you looking into this matter!!!! She is not a killer!!! Her best friend dies and like you said she is lucky enough to be alive! Please keep fighting the good fight!!

  4. The prohibitionist lawmakers make drug laws that don’t work worth a damn and then enact more laws to punish others for the failure of the laws they passed in the first place. As a former Chicago homicide prosecutor, I’d like to indict the lawmakers with aiding and abetting drug dealers and drug users for expanding drug use, overdose, harm and death with enactment of counterproductive drug prohibition laws. Drugs are too dangerous not to control and regulate, and the irony is that prohibition forfeits government control of drugs. The outlaw strategy delegates the decisions regarding what drugs will be sold, where they will be sold, to whom, at what purity, strength, cost, user age, the hours of business and no labeling or quality control. Love that drug war.
    James E. Gierach
    jamesgierach.tumblr.com
    http://www.leap.cc
    16 April 2015

  5. For those concerned with the many evils caused by prohibition drug policies, we must recognize that three United Nations drug-control treaties are at the heart of what is wrong, the treaties mandating that signatory nations criminalize recreational drug use. In April 2016, the world will have the rare opportunity to reconsider prohibition drug policy during a special session of the UN General Assembly, meeting in NYC. A group of reformed drug warriors formed an organization, called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), and had a treaty amendment prepared that could change world drug policy and end the war on drugs. Please read the Executive Summary (below) and sign the MoveOn.com petition supporting treaty amendment. Thank you all.

    LEAP’S PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF UN DRUG TREATIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The LEAP-proposed amendment to existing UN d … http://tmblr.co/ZQfrzl1fZLNTa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s