NTSB recommends lowering “legal limit” for DUIs to 0.05

From CNN.com:

Washington (CNN) — A decade-old benchmark for determining when a driver is legally drunk should be lowered in an effort to reduce alcohol-related car crashes that claim about 10,000 lives each year, U.S. safety investigators said on Tuesday.

The National Transportation Safety Board recommended that all 50 states lower the threshold from 0.08 blood-alcohol content (BAC) to 0.05.

The idea is part of a safety board initiative outlined in a staff report and approved by the panel to eliminate drunk driving, which accounts for about a third of all road deaths.

The board acknowledged that there was “no silver bullet,” but that more action is needed.

“This is critical because impaired driving remains one of the biggest killers in the United States,” NTSB Chairman Debbie Hersman said ahead of a vote by the panel on a staff report.

Hersman said progress has been made over the years to reduce drunk driving, including a range of federal and state policies, tougher law enforcement, and stepped up national advocacy. But she said too many people are still dying on America’s roads in alcohol-related crashes.

Lowering the rate to 0.05 would save about 500 to 800 lives annually, the safety board report said.

“In the last 30 years, more than 440,000 people have perished in this country due to alcohol-impaired driving. What will be our legacy 30 years from now?” Hersman asked. “If we don’t tackle alcohol-impaired driving now, when will we find the will to do so?”

Under current law, a 180-pound male typically will hit the 0.08 threshold after four drinks over an hour, according to an online blood alcohol calculator published by the University of Oklahoma. That same person could reach the 0.05 threshold after two to three drinks over the same period, according to the calculator.

Many factors besides gender and weight influence a person’s blood alcohol content level. And many states outlaw lower levels of inebriation when behind the wheel.

The NTSB investigates transportation accidents and advocates on safety issues. It cannot impose its will through regulation and can only recommend changes to federal and state agencies or legislatures, including Congress.

But the independent agency is influential on matters of public safety and its decisions can spur action from like-minded legislators and transportation agencies nationwide. States set their own BAC standards.

The board also recommended on Tuesday that states vastly expand laws allowing police to swiftly confiscate licenses from drivers who exceed the blood alcohol limits.

And it is pushing for laws requiring all first-time offenders to have ignition locking devices that prevent cars from starting until breath samples are analyzed.

In the early 1980s, when grass-roots safety groups brought attention to drunk driving, many states required a 0.15 BAC rate to demonstrated intoxication.

But over the next 24 years, Mothers Against Drunk Driving and other groups pushed states to adopt the 0.08 BAC standard, the last state falling in line in 2004.

The number of alcohol-related highway fatalities, meanwhile, dropped from 20,000 in 1980 to 9,878 in 2011, the NTSB said.

In recent years, about 31 percent of all fatal highway accidents are attributed to alcohol impairment, the NTSB said. But most of the decline in highway deaths occurred in the first decade.

“I think .05 is going to come. How long it takes to get there, we don’t know. But it will happen,” said the NTSB’s Robert Molloy, who helped guide the staff report.

For some, the vote struck close to home.

NTSB board member Robert Sumwalt noted that one of his relatives had been killed by a drunk driver, and another is serving a 15-year sentence in a related death.

Many of the recommendations “are going to be unpopular,” Sumwalt said. “But if we keep doing what we’re doing, we’re not going to make any difference.”

The NTSB said even very low levels of alcohol impair drivers.

At 0.01 BAC, drivers in simulators demonstrate attention problems and lane deviations. At 0.02, they exhibit drowsiness, and at 0.04, vigilance problems…

My initial thoughts?  This would be an extreme change, infringing on our right to consume a moderate amount of alcohol.  I have no problem with prosecuting drunk drivers.  But this change would not be doing that.  It would be prosecuting people who drive after drinking moderate amounts of alcohol and are not impaired.  This is creeping Prohibition.  If this law passed, I wouldn’t recommend anyone getting behind the wheel of a car after having had any amount of alcohol.

What do you think?

4 thoughts on “NTSB recommends lowering “legal limit” for DUIs to 0.05

  1. The National Transportation Safety Board is a non-profit organization who has absolutely no power to do anything, but “recommend” to Congress on how to deal with accidents of all kinds. In 2012, one of the top manufacturers of ignition interlock devices–Consumer Safety Technology, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa–sold quite a bit of stock to Clearlight Partners, an investment corporation, who, of course, is busily lobbying Congress, and the FTSB, to lower BrAC limits, so that they can sell more ignition interlocks.
    Unfortunately for them, the NHTSA statistics clearly show that the majority of traffic fatalities are caused by utterly sober people, and, in addition, FARS has already reported that only 3% of the traffic fatalities, in any given year, are caused by previously-convicted DUI offenders–the so-called “hardcore drunken drivers”. So, 97% of all US traffic fatalities are caused by people who have NO previous DUI convictions, whatsoever.
    The only way to stop DUI deaths would be to place an ignition interlock in every vehicle that comes off the assembly line. Putting distracted driving devices, on every vehicle in the US, will increase traffic fatalities, so there is on-going research on how to implement such a design, in a vehicle, without creating an even more dangerous hazard.
    The Illinois BAIID program was a failure to begin with. Only first-time offenders were permitted to have one, during the statutory summary suspension. Once an individual is convicted of DUI, he then has to go to a hearing, just to request one. The Illinois SOS’ administrative red tape has prevented thousands of individuals, who completed treatment, by the way, from having a BAIID–individuals who have one court supervision, and one DUI. The greatest majority of them don’t even have an accident on record. All of the statistics I have provided can be proven up, and here’s one more for you–Illinois is losing licensed drivers at the rate of 100,000 per year. Those statistics come directly from Jesse White, himself. That means, Illinois loses titling fees, licensing fees, insurance fees, gasoline taxes, etc., for the rest of those individuals’ lives. Lowering the BAC to .05, will increase the rate of unlicensed drivers in Illinois, increase the loss of income to the state, and hammer those final nails into the economic coffin of the state of Illinois–a process that began when the Illinois legislature chose to listen to MADD lobbyists, instead of their own constituency. If Illinois truly embraced the BAIID program, they would permit ALL DUI offenders to walk into Drivers Services, fill out an application, and have a licensed driver take a vehicle over to a BAIID station–conveniently located within 30 miles of a Petitioner’s home–so that it can be installed. Instead, they have to travel to only four locations in the state, show that they no longer have an alcohol problem, etc. just to install a BAIID. Seems a bit silly, doesn’t it?
    There is only one thing sillier–lowering the BrAC to .05, just so that an investment company can sell more BAIID devices, and MADD can continue to receive money from the very taxpayers that they persecute. Illinois probably will adopt such nonsense–lobbyists pay campaign funds, after all. But, here’s one question I’ll leave you with–what happens to Illinois, when it finally becomes, literally, a “pedestrian state”?
    I guess we’ll find out, won’t we?

  2. Pingback: Research muddled at best about 0.05 BAC change | illinoisduilawyer

  3. Pingback: Utah may be the first State to go to a 0.05 BAC “legal limit” | illinoisduilawyer

  4. Pingback: Utah lowers DUI legal limit to 0.05 | illinoisduilawyer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s